AU sets out limits on NGO recognition criteria

In a decision delivered by a panel of seven judges under its President, Justice Sylvain Ore, the Court ruled that “only organizations with an observer status before or a memorandum of understanding with the African Union (AU) and recognised by the same” could bring such requests.

AU sets out limits on NGO recognition criteria

In a decision delivered by a panel of seven judges under its President, Justice Sylvain Ore, the Court ruled that “only organizations with an observer status before or a memorandum of understanding with the African Union (AU) and recognised by the same” could bring such requests.

19 June 2017 Monday 10:59
AU sets out limits on NGO recognition criteria

THE African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights has delivered a landmark ruling, paving way for non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to file requests for advisory opinions before the Court.

In a decision delivered by a panel of seven judges under its President, Justice Sylvain Ore, the Court ruled that “only organizations with an observer status before or a memorandum of understanding with the African Union (AU) and recognised by the same” could bring such requests.

It was making a ruling following an application filed by a Nigerian NGO, the Socio- Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) which was registered in 2004 and based in Nigeria with a primary objective of promotion of transparency and accountability in the public and private sectors through human rights.

The Pan African Court President, Ore, Vice-President Justice Ben Kioko and Justices Gerard Ninguyeko, El Hadji Guisse, Rataa Ben Achoiur, Sollomy Bossa and Angelo Matusse unanimously declared that the Court does not have personal jurisdiction to give an opinion on this particular request.

The matter that was filed at the Registry of the Court on March 14, 2013, the latter transmitting it to the African Commission as well as to member states of the AU so that those interested could submit written observations on the request – after which the following made submissions: Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cape Verde, Nigeria, Uganda, Zambia and the Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria (as amicus curiae).

Dailynews

Updated: 19.06.2017 11:06
Comments
Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
<strong>Warning!</strong> Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.