Nato would LOSE against Russia in the outbreak of World War 3 claims SHOCKING report
banner68
banner58

Nato would LOSE against Russia in the outbreak of World War 3 claims SHOCKING report

Nato was formed in 1949 in response to the threat of the Soviet Union

banner57

Nato would LOSE against Russia in the outbreak of World War 3 claims SHOCKING report

Nato was formed in 1949 in response to the threat of the Soviet Union

15 July 2018 Sunday 11:12
Nato would LOSE against Russia in the outbreak of World War 3 claims SHOCKING report

NATO would lose against Russia in the outbreak of World War 3 and Donald Trump’s recent actions at the summit has reduced the alliance’s strength even further, according to a leading think tank.

Nato was formed in 1949 in response to the threat of the Soviet Union.

The USSR responded with the Warsaw Pact, which was a collective defence treaty among the Soviet's satellite states.

Trump claims Nato members are not spending enough defence


Although the Soviet Union collapsed in the early 1990s, Nato remained in place.

Tensions have recently resurged between Russia and the West and some have even dubbed it a "New Cold War".

Since the 2014 Russian military intervention of Ukraine, Nato has moved to bolster its eastern flank by creating the four battlegroups at a 2016 summit in Warsaw.

Nato has moved to bolster its eastern flank


Nato may have four and a half times the number of aircraft if compared with Russia and the only fifth-generation warplanes on the battlefield, but according to a 2016 report by Rand Corp: “The Russians have advantages over current NATO forces in integrated air defence, long-range artillery, anti-armour munitions, and electronic warfare.”

A report from May 2018 said: "Given NATO’s current posture and capability, including the European EFP (Enhanced Forward Presence) battalions and rotational US armoured brigade combat team, Russia still enjoys a substantial time-distance advantage in the initial days and weeks of a conventional ground campaign against the Baltic States.

"Looking out past the initial weeks, the comparison on the ground would actually get worse for NATO before getting better."

Comments
Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
<strong>Warning!</strong> Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.
Avatar
Wambura Maska Wambura 2018-07-15 17:00:53

Thanks for an informative article on NATO vs Russia. While I do not strongly agrew with the ideas presentwd by the author, I tend to be inclined to think that NATO will be backed by USA during any operation. This combination is a serious and deadly force against any threat. I think we all remember that USA + France + UK carried out a military operation successfully in Syria - a country whose airspacw & ground were dominated by Russia's military force.

Avatar
Ryan 2018-07-16 02:11:15

Nothing really surprises me anymore. Anyone who REALLY wants to know whats going on should definitely check this out, its a pretty scary warning from a history and religion professor. Pretty damn eye opening: https://ancientprophecy.weebly.com/